best lawn mower to buy 2012 image
Illuminati
I recently saw the 2012 release, "Sinister." Let me tell you what: this movie is scary as f^&*ing hell! The star is Ethan Hawke, who is now one of my most favorite actors. Scott Derrickson directed the film (he helped write the Exorcism of Emily Rose, which is another awesome movie).
I watched this movie late at night, starting it at probably 3 in the morning. What better time to watch a horror film that is scary as hell, while being all alone? I've seen many a horror flick, thousands in fact, and consider myself a horror movie connoisseur, but Sinister made me jump a few times.
What really makes the hair on the back of your neck, hand and arms (well my neck isn't hairy) stand up, was the old film reels that show murders of entire families. Each reel is named something crafty like "Pool Party '86," "Sleepy Time '88," etc. Not to mention the twisted methods in which the families were brutally massacred: one incident included the family being buried up to their neck in the back yard, and the killer taking a push lawn mower, and, well, use your imagination.
You get the creeps when the lead character Ellison Oswalt (Ethan) finds images of the killer hidden in the films. Yet you only see a reflection of the killer's face in the water, or mirror for 1 second.
The film is next to perfection in it's genre. It's a mixture of a mystery, suspense, horror, and, believe it or not, a "snuff" film, all in one.
9 out of 10 Stars.
Anyone else seen it? What did you think?
Answer
6/10. An okay and slightly overrated movie with its own strong points. Definitely not the scariest movie in recent years like what people seem to keep saying though.
Ethan Hawke gave a wonderful performance as usual. Romantic flicks, drama films, horror movies â is there anything this guy cannot do? His acting was the filmâs biggest strength, in my opinion. He conveyed fear so effectively and I love the portrayal of his growing obsession with the strange disappearances and happenings.
I like how the tapes were creatively named⦠so punny. The twist about moving house was my favourite one, though the rest werenât that impressive or convincing. This was especially more so since hardly any explanation was offered about the plot. They tried, but so many âbut why?sâ remain. Maybe I just didnât really buy the whole demonic boogieman thing. So does it possess the children or what?
There was a lack of character development as well and I almost wondered if the movie and parents forgot that they had two children, not one. Why was the son experiencing night terrors and behaving strangely when all along it was the daughter who the Bughuul wanted? And I donât know what everyone else except for Ethan Hawkeâs character is doing.
The buildup of fear and tension was pretty effective despite being mostly cheap scares. You know, the usual appear-in-the-dark-from-behind etc etc. However, there is just something about Ethan Hawke in an empty room with nothing but his screen and a box of tapes. I get nervous everytime he is creeping or out of the attic.
6/10. An okay and slightly overrated movie with its own strong points. Definitely not the scariest movie in recent years like what people seem to keep saying though.
Ethan Hawke gave a wonderful performance as usual. Romantic flicks, drama films, horror movies â is there anything this guy cannot do? His acting was the filmâs biggest strength, in my opinion. He conveyed fear so effectively and I love the portrayal of his growing obsession with the strange disappearances and happenings.
I like how the tapes were creatively named⦠so punny. The twist about moving house was my favourite one, though the rest werenât that impressive or convincing. This was especially more so since hardly any explanation was offered about the plot. They tried, but so many âbut why?sâ remain. Maybe I just didnât really buy the whole demonic boogieman thing. So does it possess the children or what?
There was a lack of character development as well and I almost wondered if the movie and parents forgot that they had two children, not one. Why was the son experiencing night terrors and behaving strangely when all along it was the daughter who the Bughuul wanted? And I donât know what everyone else except for Ethan Hawkeâs character is doing.
The buildup of fear and tension was pretty effective despite being mostly cheap scares. You know, the usual appear-in-the-dark-from-behind etc etc. However, there is just something about Ethan Hawke in an empty room with nothing but his screen and a box of tapes. I get nervous everytime he is creeping or out of the attic.
And you think he's on our side?
�Chins Up
Barry Obama enacts a drilling moratorium (only two permits in the last year); Obamaâs 2012 budget that, for example, cuts tax incentives for energy exploration; and anti-drilling regulatory policies. Sarah Palin discusses in some detail an area north of the Arctic Circle where the U.S. Geological Survey tells us there are some 90 billion barrels of technically recoverable oil and 1,670 trillion cubic feet of technically recoverable natural gas, âone-third of which is in Alaskan territory.â
Judging by his actions, his rhetoric, his Third-World, anti-imperialist, Frantz-Fanon-imbued vision of Diminished America, my hunch is no. To this presidentâs way of thinking, high gas prices are a solution, not a problem. Cheap energy is the launch pad of a soaring economy, one beyond government (his) control. And this president wants control: over what we eat (less), drive (smaller) and live (lower thermostats). As Palin reminds us, Secretary of Energy Steven Chu actually pines for gasoline prices as high as Europeâs ($9-plus) as a tool of social regimentation âto coax consumers into buying more-efficient cars,â as the Wall Street Journal reported, âand living in neighborhoods closer to work.â Chu told the paper, âSomehow we have to figure out how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels in Europe.â Oh, and by the way: Not one senator whose salary we pay bothered to query Chu during his confirmation hearing about how regular Americans with hour-long commutes (as opposed to Berkeley professors like Chu) would fare in this social-engineering scheme.
How would you like to pay $50 to fill up your lawn mower or $1000 to fill up a 22 foot boat?
This man makes no sense whatsoever.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zbpcnDPgiQ&feature=fvsr
http://blog.cagle.com/2011/03/drilling-ban-fueling-obamas-controlling-agenda/
Answer
I know for a fact he's NOT on "our side", he's a dyed in the wool socialist who would be tickled pink if the Soviets had won the cold war
I know for a fact he's NOT on "our side", he's a dyed in the wool socialist who would be tickled pink if the Soviets had won the cold war
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar